Sakshi Sohan Sirasat @ Sakshi Gautam Gaikwad Shirish Milindrao Kamble, R. A. PANDIT vs Sohan Rashtrapal Sirsat — MCA/130/2026

Case under Transfer Matter Section 24. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

Next hearing 19-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM030183812026

e-Filing Number

30-04-2026

Filing Number

MCA/13677/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

MCA/130/2026

Registration Date

06-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Transfer Matter Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sakshi Sohan Sirasat @ Sakshi Gautam Gaikwad Shirish Milindrao Kamble, R. A. PANDIT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sohan Rashtrapal Sirsat

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    —

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

    Case Summary: MCA/130/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected the applicant's prayer for stay of proceedings pending before the Civil Judge at Daund. The court held that no necessity existed to stay proceedings, particularly given video conferencing availability. The court noted personal appearance is not mandatory unless specifically directed. Notice was issued to the respondent returnable on 19 June 2026, and the applicant may seek separate permission to participate via video conferencing before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-May-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MCA/130/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MCA/130/2026 The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) rejected the applicant's prayer for stay of proceedings pending before the Civil Judge at Daund. The court held that no necessity existed to stay proceedings, particularly given video conferencing availability. The court noted personal appearance is not mandatory unless specifically directed. Notice was issued to the respondent returnable on 19 June 2026, and the applicant may seek separate permission to participate via video conferencing before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case