BALASAHEB SONYABAPU SHITOLE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — WP/4240/2017

Case under Maharashtra Pre of Frg& Con Holding Act-1947. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM030129892017

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

30th March 2017

Filing Number

WP/10570/2017

Filing Date

29-03-2017

Registration No

WP/4240/2017

Registration Date

29-03-2017

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Pre of Frg& Con Holding Act-1947

Petitioner(s)

BALASAHEB SONYABAPU SHITOLE

Adv. NANGARE PRASHANT R.

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Adv. ,Rode Dilip B.,FOR R-4/N THRU GPA,SANCHETI RAHUL RATILAL,GP FOR R/ 1 TO 3,RODE DILIP B. AND ASHWIN V. HON FOR R.NO. 4(A) TO 4 (D) 1123

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

22-06-2020

FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE (HIGH ON BOARD) [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

30-03-2017

URGENT CIRCULATION - CIVIL

07-07-2017

FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE (HIGH ON BOARD) [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]

08-06-2017

DUE ADMISSION -CIVIL

07-05-2026

AT 2.30 PM CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

Orders

07-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad quashed the 2017 order of the Minister (Revenue) that had set aside a 2012 Deputy Director of Land Records order, and restored the original 2012 order. The court relied on precedent from WP 13712/2017, requiring authorities to justify any reduction in a landholder's holdings, which both counsel agreed covered the present case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad quashed the 2017 order of the Minister (Revenue) that had set aside a 2012 Deputy Director of Land Records order, and restored the original 2012 order. The court relied on precedent from WP 13712/2017, requiring authorities to justify any reduction in a landholder's holdings, which both counsel agreed covered the present case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case