SHANKAR MAHADA KARDILE DIED THR HIS LRS PARVATABAI SHANKAR KARDILE Jadhav N.L. vs NARAYAN PREMRAJ CHORBELE AND OTHERS — WP/3863/2022
Case under Constitution of India Section 226 AND 227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM030091062022
Filing Number
WP/6816/2022
Filing Date
07-03-2022
Registration No
WP/3863/2022
Registration Date
24-03-2022
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
Bench Type
Single
Category
LAND LAWS AND AGRICULTURAL TENANCIES ( 21 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHANKAR MAHADA KARDILE DIED THR HIS LRS PARVATABAI SHANKAR KARDILE Jadhav N.L.
Respondent(s)
NARAYAN PREMRAJ CHORBELE AND OTHERS
Adv. KAKDE YUVRAJ V. FOR R.NO. 1,3,5,6A TO 6C TO 14,AGP for R. Nos. 15 and 16.,Adv. Yuvraj Kakade for R. No. 4A and 4B (Appear).,Adv. Y.V. Kakade, for R. No. 12 (appear in court) 1123
AMRUTLAL PREMRAJ CHORBELE
BHAGWANDAS PREMRAJ CHORBELE
VIJAYKUMAR KUNDANMAL CHORBELE
AJIT KUNDANMAL CHORBELE
NARANGI KANTILAL MUTHA DIEF THR LRS KANTILAL MANIKCHAND MUTHA
SUMAN JAWAHARLAL KATARIYA
CHANDAN HASTIMAL GANDHI
SANJAY BIRDICHAND CHORBELE
PRAMOD BIRDICHAND CHORBELE
MANGAL ARUNLAL MUNOT
SARLA SUBHASH GANDHI
JYOTI DILIP BHANDARI
SANGITA SUNIL GANDHI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SIDDHESHWAR SUNDARRAO THOMBRE
PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
DUE ADMISSION CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2022 | PETITIONS FOR ADMISSION - FRESH - CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 04-05-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 27-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 08-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
| 01-04-2026 | DUE ADMISSION CIVIL |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/3863/2022 The High Court allowed the petitioners' writ petition challenging a revenue tribunal's order denying them tenancy rights to agricultural land. The court found that the respondents failed to establish valid surrender of tenancy by the original protected tenant Babu Laxman Shinde under the Hyderabad Tenancy Act, holding that mere revenue entries cannot constitute lawful surrender without mandatory written documentation and Tahsildar verification. The court further held that under Section 40 of the Tenancy Act, tenancy rights are heritable, and the petitioners, as successors through a will executed by the deceased tenant, were entitled to continue as deemed tenants on the same terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/3863/2022 The High Court allowed the petitioners' writ petition challenging a revenue tribunal's order denying them tenancy rights to agricultural land. The court found that the respondents failed to establish valid surrender of tenancy by the original protected tenant Babu Laxman Shinde under the Hyderabad Tenancy Act, holding that mere revenue entries cannot constitute lawful surrender without mandatory written documentation and Tahsildar verification. The court further held that under Section 40 of the Tenancy Act, tenancy rights are heritable, and the petitioners, as successors through a will executed by the deceased tenant, were entitled to continue as deemed tenants on the same terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts