ASHOK VYANKATI PAMPATWAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS — PIL/29/2016

Case under Public Interest Litigation. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Feb-2016

CNR: HCBM030053672016

Filing Number

PIL/4162/2016

Filing Date

08-Feb-2016

Registration No

PIL/29/2016

Registration Date

16-Feb-2016

Judge

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Coram

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. Kadethankar

Bench Type

Division

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Public Interest Litigation

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHOK VYANKATI PAMPATWAR

    Adv. Chandole S.V.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

    Adv. KAMBLE NEHA B. FOR R.NO. 6 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vibha Kankanwadi,hon'ble Shri Justice Ajit B. KadethankarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the PIL filed by Ashok Vyankati Pampatwar seeking implementation of village Bomnali's resettlement under Government Resolutions of 1999 and 2006. The court found the petition infructuous after the State's affidavit confirmed that the resettlement had already been implemented, rendering the relief sought moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Feb-2022

    Hon'ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,hon'ble Shri Justice S. G. DigeView PDF

  4. 23-Mar-2020

    Notification

  5. 23-Feb-2016

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R. M. Borde,hon'ble Shri Justice A. I. S. CheemaView PDF

  6. 23-Feb-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 08-Feb-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. PIL/29/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) disposed of the PIL filed by Ashok Vyankati Pampatwar seeking implementation of village Bomnali's resettlement under Government Resolutions of 1999 and 2006. The court found the petition infructuous after the State's affidavit confirmed that the resettlement had already been implemented, rendering the relief sought moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case