GOOGAL DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR AKANKSHA SINGH vs ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY — WP/2056/2026
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020318112025
Filing Number
WP/31811/2025
Filing Date
04-10-2025
Registration No
WP/2056/2026
Registration Date
27-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Category
SLUM AREAS ( 49 )
Sub-Category
Slum areas ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOOGAL DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR AKANKSHA SINGH
Adv. Jennifer Sagayarajan
Respondent(s)
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
CO-OPERATIVE OFFICER, CLASS - I, SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
BHORBATPADA SRA CHS
SHREEJI EARTHRISE LLP
APEX GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-11-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 26-11-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Summary The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) to expeditiously hear and decide the petitioner's appeal (No. 290 of 2024) challenging the Assistant Registrar SRA's order within 10 weeks. The court kept all contentions open and required the petitioner to cooperate with the AGRC without seeking unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) to expeditiously hear and decide the petitioner's appeal (No. 290 of 2024) challenging the Assistant Registrar SRA's order within 10 weeks. The court kept all contentions open and required the petitioner to cooperate with the AGRC without seeking unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts