GOOGAL DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR AKANKSHA SINGH vs ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY — WP/2056/2026

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020318112025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/31811/2025

Filing Date

04-10-2025

Registration No

WP/2056/2026

Registration Date

27-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Bench Type

Division

Category

SLUM AREAS ( 49 )

Sub-Category

Slum areas ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

GOOGAL DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR AKANKSHA SINGH

Adv. Jennifer Sagayarajan

Respondent(s)

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY

CO-OPERATIVE OFFICER, CLASS - I, SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY

BHORBATPADA SRA CHS

SHREEJI EARTHRISE LLP

APEX GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

19-11-2025

FOR CIRCULATION

26-11-2025

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Summary The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) to expeditiously hear and decide the petitioner's appeal (No. 290 of 2024) challenging the Assistant Registrar SRA's order within 10 weeks. The court kept all contentions open and required the petitioner to cooperate with the AGRC without seeking unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) to expeditiously hear and decide the petitioner's appeal (No. 290 of 2024) challenging the Assistant Registrar SRA's order within 10 weeks. The court kept all contentions open and required the petitioner to cooperate with the AGRC without seeking unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case