SUHAS BABU GOSAVI vs APEX GRIEVANCES REDRESSAL COMMITTEE — WP/2098/2026

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 23rd April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020288652025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/28865/2025

Filing Date

15-09-2025

Registration No

WP/2098/2026

Registration Date

29-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

Bench Type

Single

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

TOWN PLANNING MATTERS INCLUDING MATTERS RELATING TO RESERVATION,TOWN PLANNING SCHEMES ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

SUHAS BABU GOSAVI

Adv. LAW ORIGIN

Respondent(s)

APEX GRIEVANCES REDRESSAL COMMITTEE

SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORI

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

VIJAY KAMAL PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.

Adv. Virendra J Tiwari

ELLORA PROJECT CONSULTANTS

KULUPWADI CHS (PROPOSED)

Adv. Archana Karmokar

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

06-10-2025

FOR ADMISSION

10-10-2025

FOR ADMISSION

11-11-2025

FOR ADMISSION

25-11-2025

FOR ADMISSION

10-12-2025

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

23-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE FARHAN PARVEZ DUBASH

Case Summary: WP(L)/28865/2025 - Suhas Babu Gosavi v. AGRC & Others The Bombay High Court disposed of the petitioner's writ petition challenging the dismissal of his application for developer removal under the Slum Act, finding that as an individual member, he lacked standing to maintain such application. However, the court permitted the housing society (now supporting his cause) to file a fresh removal application before the SRA CEO by May 8, 2026, which must be decided on merits within eight weeks, uninfluenced by previous orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(L)/28865/2025 - Suhas Babu Gosavi v. AGRC & Others The Bombay High Court disposed of the petitioner's writ petition challenging the dismissal of his application for developer removal under the Slum Act, finding that as an individual member, he lacked standing to maintain such application. However, the court permitted the housing society (now supporting his cause) to file a fresh removal application before the SRA CEO by May 8, 2026, which must be decided on merits within eight weeks, uninfluenced by previous orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case