Nalin Vallabhbhai Patel vs Atharva Realtors — CARAP/430/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020283832025

e-Filing Number

09-09-2025

Filing Number

CARAP/28382/2025

Filing Date

11-Sep-2025

Registration No

CARAP/430/2025

Registration Date

26-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

APPOINTMENT OF ARBITRATORS ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nalin Vallabhbhai Patel

    Adv. Nilesh Gala

  2. 2.Sanjay Madhubhai Malani

    Adv. GALA NILESH NENSHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Atharva Realtors

    Adv. ,MK JURIS ASSOCIATES,MK JURIS ASSOCIATES 1123

  2. 2.Deepak Ambalal Shah

  3. 3.Shrenik Jain

    Adv. SHAH KAPIL PRAKASH

  4. 4.Bahubali Estate Private Limited

    Adv. SHAH KAPIL PRAKASH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed an application seeking appointment of a new arbitrator after the court had previously refused to extend the mandate of an earlier arbitrator under Section 29A of the Arbitration Act, 1996. The court held that where parties are found at fault for abandoning arbitration proceedings, they cannot be rewarded by appointing a substitute arbitrator; the arbitration proceedings terminate when the court refuses extension due to the applicant's negligent conduct, and a fresh appointment cannot be made as this would tantamount to reviewing the Section 29A order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  10. 05-Feb-2026

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  11. 20-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  12. 20-Jan-2026

    Arbp-For Hearing And Final Disposal U/S 11

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  13. 06-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  14. 06-Jan-2026

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre

  15. 18-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati DangreView PDF

  16. 18-Dec-2025

    Arbp-For Hearing And Final Disposal U/S 11

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre

  17. 05-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati DangreView PDF

  18. 05-Dec-2025

    Arbp-For Hearing And Final Disposal U/S 11

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre

  19. 21-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Bharati DangreView PDF

  20. 21-Nov-2025

    Final Hearing - Section 14 / 15

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  21. 19-Nov-2025

    Final Hearing - Section 14 / 15

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  22. 14-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  23. 06-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  24. 06-Oct-2025

    Fresh Matters Auto Listed

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  25. 06-Oct-2025

    Final Hearing - Section 14 / 15

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  26. 15-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  27. 15-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 11-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CARAP/430/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed an application seeking appointment of a new arbitrator after the court had previously refused to extend the mandate of an earlier arbitrator under Section 29A of the Arbitration Act, 1996. The court held that where parties are found at fault for abandoning arbitration proceedings, they cannot be rewarded by appointing a substitute arbitrator; the arbitration proceedings terminate when the court refuses extension due to the applicant's negligent conduct, and a fresh appointment cannot be made as this would tantamount to reviewing the Section 29A order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case