PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8 vs VEENA INVESTMENT PVT.LTD. — ITXA/2681/2018

Case under Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A. Next hearing: 09th July 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM020232112018

Filing Number

ITXA/2363/2018

Filing Date

21-Aug-2018

Registration No

ITXA/2681/2018

Registration Date

08-Oct-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

Bench Type

Division

Category

DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-8

    Adv. Suresh Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VEENA INVESTMENT PVT.LTD.

Case History

  1. 09-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jul-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF

    Case Summary: ITXA/2681/2018 The High Court of Bombay admitted the income tax appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-8 against Veena Investment Pvt. Ltd. After hearing both counsel and confirming that notice was properly served on the respondent, the court adjourned the case for final hearing in due course. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

  5. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF

  6. 06-Oct-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. ITXA/2681/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ITXA/2681/2018 The High Court of Bombay admitted the income tax appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-8 against Veena Investment Pvt. Ltd. After hearing both counsel and confirming that notice was properly served on the respondent, the court adjourned the case for final hearing in due course. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case