SABA QASIM KUTTY vs THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI (MCGM) Advocate - KOMAL PUNJABI BMC, ,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC — WP/3521/2025
Case under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020229572025
Filing Number
WP/22954/2025
Filing Date
25-Jul-2025
Registration No
WP/3521/2025
Registration Date
15-Sep-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Bench Type
Division
Category
LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )
Sub-Category
Municipal Corporation ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 06-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SABA QASIM KUTTY
Adv. Vedchetan Patil
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI (MCGM) Advocate - KOMAL PUNJABI BMC, ,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC
-
2.HI RISE REALTY
Adv. SATISH MULEY,Mosin Naik ZHOAIB SAYYED
-
3.SARAH ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SADIK RATANSI
-
4.MOHAMMED SHAFIQUE HAJI ABDUL MAJEED QURESHI
-
5.AYUB AZHARI
-
6.SHAIKH MOTIURREHMAN
-
7.ASLAM PATNI
Adv. SATISH MULEY,Mosin Naik ZHOAIB SAYYED
-
8.ZEESHAN SHAMSI
Adv. SATISH MULEY,Mosin Naik ZHOAIB SAYYED
-
9.SHAFIQUE QURESHI
-
10.VASMEEN ZATKAL
Adv. Rukhsar,KATTI
-
11.YASMEEN ZATKAL
Adv. Rukhsar,KATTI
-
12.SHAFIQUE QURESHI
-
13.ZEESHAN SHAMSI
Adv. SATISH MULEY,Mosin Naik ZHOAIB SAYYED
-
14.SHAFIQUE QURESHI
-
15.SHAFIQUE OURESHI
-
16.UNNAMED THIRD-PARTY OCCUPANTS
-
17.UNNAMED THIRD-PARTY OCCUPANTS
-
18.CHIEF FIRE OFFICER FIRE DEPARTMENT MCGM
Adv. KOMAL PUNJABI BMC
Case History
-
27-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
Summary: Three consolidated writ petitions filed against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai were adjourned due to paucity of time on 1st April, 2026. The case has been stood over to 27th April, 2026, with any ad-interim or interim relief granted earlier continuing to operate until the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Compliance
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
06-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
For Compliance
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri
-
17-Feb-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
10-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF
-
09-Feb-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
03-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF
-
03-Feb-2026
Urgent Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri
-
08-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF
-
08-Jan-2026
Urgent Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
09-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
26-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
26-Nov-2025
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
06-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
06-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/3521/2025
Summary: Three consolidated writ petitions filed against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai were adjourned due to paucity of time on 1st April, 2026. The case has been stood over to 27th April, 2026, with any ad-interim or interim relief granted earlier continuing to operate until the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts