RAMESH KASHIRAM KAMBLE OMKAR RAMKRISHNA DHAKAL vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI — WP/1621/2026
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 226. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020191612025
Filing Number
WP/19160/2025
Filing Date
26-Jun-2025
Registration No
WP/1621/2026
Registration Date
02-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Bench Type
Division
Category
SLUM AREAS ( 49 )
Sub-Category
Slum areas ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 06-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMESH KASHIRAM KAMBLE OMKAR RAMKRISHNA DHAKAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
-
2.SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY, THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
-
3.SHRAMIK EKTA CHS FEDERATION
-
4.LOKHANDWALA KATARIA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD.
Case History
-
09-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF
Summary: The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Ramesh Kashiram Kamble against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The petitioner was permitted to approach the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) within four weeks, with respondent No.4 agreeing not to raise objections regarding delay in filing the appeal. The petition was disposed of with all contentions kept open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe
-
24-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP/1621/2026
Summary: The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Ramesh Kashiram Kamble against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The petitioner was permitted to approach the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) within four weeks, with respondent No.4 agreeing not to raise objections regarding delay in filing the appeal. The petition was disposed of with all contentions kept open. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts