H. R. CONSTRUCTION CO. vs MEGHRAJ MALAVIYA Advocate - RMG Law Associates — WP/4337/2024

Case under Consumer Protection Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 20th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020176572024

Filing Number

WP/17652/2024

Filing Date

06-Jun-2024

Registration No

WP/4337/2024

Registration Date

18-Sep-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

20-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 06-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Consumer Protection Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.H. R. CONSTRUCTION CO.

    Adv. Tushar Goradia

  2. 2.KANTILAL A. PATEL

  3. 3.RAJESH A. PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MEGHRAJ MALAVIYA Advocate - RMG Law Associates

  2. 2.RAHUL N. PATEL

  3. 3.MAHESH N. PATEL

  4. 4.RAJESH LIFESPACES PVT. LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The High Court of Bombay disposed of the Writ Petition by approving a compromise settlement reached between Petitioners 2 & 3 (two partners of H.R. Construction Co.) and Respondent No. 1 (Meghraj Malviya). Under the consent terms, Petitioners 2 & 3 agreed to pay Rs. 45 lakh in installments to settle their liability, and Respondent No. 1 agreed to withdraw execution proceedings against them while continuing proceedings against other parties. The court struck off Respondents 2 & 3 from the case and declared the petition resolved based on the agreed settlement terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. Sathe

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

  6. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Ms Justice Aarti A. SatheView PDF

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    -For Settlement-

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

  8. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  10. 23-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  11. 23-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  12. 16-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  13. 16-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  14. 02-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  15. 02-Feb-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  16. 28-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  17. 28-Jan-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  18. 27-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

  19. 27-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 06-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4337/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The High Court of Bombay disposed of the Writ Petition by approving a compromise settlement reached between Petitioners 2 & 3 (two partners of H.R. Construction Co.) and Respondent No. 1 (Meghraj Malviya). Under the consent terms, Petitioners 2 & 3 agreed to pay Rs. 45 lakh in installments to settle their liability, and Respondent No. 1 agreed to withdraw execution proceedings against them while continuing proceedings against other parties. The court struck off Respondents 2 & 3 from the case and declared the petition resolved based on the agreed settlement terms. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case