MAN VIZ DEVELOPER LLP vs PARAS DARSHAN COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD — ARBP/229/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020164092026

e-Filing Number

04-05-2026

Filing Number

ARBP/16408/2026

Filing Date

05-May-2026

Registration No

ARBP/229/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Interim Relief ( 102 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAN VIZ DEVELOPER LLP

    Adv. BhavinBhatia

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARAS DARSHAN COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD

  2. 2.HARJEET SINGH MOKHA

  3. 3.HARJINDER SINGH MOKHA

  4. 4.JEET KAUR NANDA

  5. 5.NEETA ANAND

  6. 6.GURSHARAN KAUR MOKHA

  7. 7.BALJEET SINGH MOKHA

  8. 8.SHANTILAL PARMANAND SHAH

  9. 9.SAROJBEN SHANTILAL SHAH

  10. 10.SHANTILAL P SHAH HUF

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    Case Summary: ARBP/229/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of MAN VIZ Developer LLP's Section 9 arbitration petition seeking interim measures for possession of building units. The respondents, through their counsel and in-person appearances, undertook to vacate all disputed units within four weeks, rendering adjudication unnecessary and resulting in case dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  4. 05-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ARBP/229/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ARBP/229/2026 The Bombay High Court disposed of MAN VIZ Developer LLP's Section 9 arbitration petition seeking interim measures for possession of building units. The respondents, through their counsel and in-person appearances, undertook to vacate all disputed units within four weeks, rendering adjudication unnecessary and resulting in case dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case