ELITE HOUSING LLP Narayanan and narayanan vs PREM MAYARAM BULCHANDANI — ARBP/261/2026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 29-A. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020152712026

e-Filing Number

28-04-2026

Filing Number

ARBP/15270/2026

Filing Date

28-Apr-2026

Registration No

ARBP/261/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Extension of Arbitral Mandate ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 29-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ELITE HOUSING LLP Narayanan and narayanan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PREM MAYARAM BULCHANDANI

  2. 2.RAMESH MAYARAM BULCHANDANI

  3. 3.DEEPAK MAYARAM BULCHANDRANI

  4. 4.BHAVNA KISHORE BULCHANDANI

  5. 5.MOHIT KISHORE BULCHANDANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted Elite Housing LLP's petition to extend the arbitral tribunal's mandate by three months under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, extending the deadline from April 30, 2026 to August 31, 2026. The court approved the joint request by both parties' counsel, considering the stage of the arbitral proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. ARBP/261/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted Elite Housing LLP's petition to extend the arbitral tribunal's mandate by three months under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, extending the deadline from April 30, 2026 to August 31, 2026. The court approved the joint request by both parties' counsel, considering the stage of the arbitral proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case