Thomas Joseph RJ LAW vs Tirupati Developers — HCBM20152432026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section Order 1 Rule 10. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020152432026
e-Filing Number
28-04-2026
Filing Number
IA/15242/2026
Filing Date
28-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thomas Joseph RJ LAW
-
2.Jancy Joseph Thomas
Adv. RJ LAW
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tirupati Developers
-
2.Manu Narayan Sodi
-
3.Manmohan Mahadeo Bhandari
-
4.Sterling Co operative Housing Society Ltd
Case History
-
24-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
24-Jun-2026
Interim Application
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
07-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
Case Summary Thomas Joseph and Jancy Joseph Thomas v. Tirupati Developers and Ors. The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division adjourned the interim application seeking impleadment of the purchasers in the Society's suit against the developer. The applicants were directed to submit all documentation evidencing their claimed entitlements to the Society within one week; the Society must file its reply within three weeks thereafter, with rejoinder due within one week. The matter was stood over to June 24, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Interim Application
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
05-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Apr-2026
Case filed
Case Summary Thomas Joseph and Jancy Joseph Thomas v. Tirupati Developers and Ors. The Bombay High Court's Commercial Division adjourned the interim application seeking impleadment of the purchasers in the Society's suit against the developer. The applicants were directed to submit all documentation evidencing their claimed entitlements to the Society within one week; the Society must file its reply within three weeks thereafter, with rejoinder due within one week. The matter was stood over to June 24, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts