PHONOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE LIMITED vs URBAN MAYABAZAR — IA/3009/2026

Case under Copyright Act Section 51. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020136492025

e-Filing Number

29-04-2025

Filing Number

IA/13646/2025

Filing Date

29-Apr-2025

Registration No

IA/3009/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Copyright Act Section 51

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PHONOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE LIMITED

    Adv. Jeenal Upadhyay

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.URBAN MAYABAZAR

  2. 2.KALLEM RAGHAVENDRA REDDY

  3. 3.PRANEETH REDDY SAMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jul-2026

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  3. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    The Bombay High Court confirmed interim relief against Urban Mayabazar and others for unauthorized broadcasting of sound recordings owned by Phonographic Performance Limited. The court found copyright infringement under Section 30 of the Copyright Act, 1957, and continued the ad-interim injunction as defendants failed to appear or dispute the plaintiff's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  7. 17-Sep-2025

    For Ad-Interim Relief

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  8. 08-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  9. 08-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 29-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3009/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court confirmed interim relief against Urban Mayabazar and others for unauthorized broadcasting of sound recordings owned by Phonographic Performance Limited. The court found copyright infringement under Section 30 of the Copyright Act, 1957, and continued the ad-interim injunction as defendants failed to appear or dispute the plaintiff's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case