MOHD. IMRAN HAJI MOHD. SULEMAN QUERESHI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TH. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY — HCBM20126772026

Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020126772026

Filing Number

WP/12677/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

DEVELOPEMENT PERMISSION ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD. IMRAN HAJI MOHD. SULEMAN QUERESHI

    Adv. Fayzan Khan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA TH. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

  2. 2.MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

  3. 3.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

  4. 4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (BLDG PROPOSAL)

  5. 5.ABIL BUILDCON LLP

  6. 6.DB (BKC) REALTORS PVT LTD

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing MHADA (Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority) to expeditiously decide the petitioner's representation dated 3rd December 2025 within twelve weeks. The court made no observations on the merits and kept all contentions open, including the issue of delay in submitting the representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing MHADA (Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority) to expeditiously decide the petitioner's representation dated 3rd December 2025 within twelve weeks. The court made no observations on the merits and kept all contentions open, including the issue of delay in submitting the representation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case