SHARAD PRABHAKAR CHAVHAN vs MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY — HCBM20120202026

Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020120202026

Filing Number

WP/12020/2026

Filing Date

04-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

MHADA ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHARAD PRABHAKAR CHAVHAN

    Adv. Dileep Satale

  2. 2.CHANDRASHEKHAR NARAYAN MORE

  3. 3.ABDUL SATTAR HAROON KHATRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

  2. 2.THE VICE PRESIDENT AND CEO

  3. 3.SHREE DATT SAI CHSL

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court issued notice to Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority in a writ petition by Sharad Prabhakar Chavhan and others, who have occupied transit premises for 40 years but were excluded from an ongoing redevelopment project without rehabilitation or permanent alternate accommodation. The case is adjourned to 11th June 2026, with ad-interim relief granted in terms of prayer clause (d) until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court issued notice to Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority in a writ petition by Sharad Prabhakar Chavhan and others, who have occupied transit premises for 40 years but were excluded from an ongoing redevelopment project without rehabilitation or permanent alternate accommodation. The case is adjourned to 11th June 2026, with ad-interim relief granted in terms of prayer clause (d) until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case