GUNDECHA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD Maniar Srivastava Associates vs R A K MAGNUM REALTY LLP Advocate - Ajaylawassociates — HCBM20072922026

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9. Disposed: DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020072922026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

CARBP/7292/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Interim Relief ( 102 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GUNDECHA CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD Maniar Srivastava Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R A K MAGNUM REALTY LLP Advocate - Ajaylawassociates

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Arbp-For Hearing And Final Disposal U/S 9

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of the Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by Gundecha Construction Pvt. Ltd. against R.A.K. Magnum Realty LLP after the parties reached an amicable settlement. The Court-appointed Mediator's report confirmed the settlement, which was recorded in Consent Terms accepted as undertakings to the Court, leading to the petition's disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. Marne

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Sandeep V. MarneView PDF

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the Commercial Arbitration Petition filed by Gundecha Construction Pvt. Ltd. against R.A.K. Magnum Realty LLP after the parties reached an amicable settlement. The Court-appointed Mediator's report confirmed the settlement, which was recorded in Consent Terms accepted as undertakings to the Court, leading to the petition's disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case