HI-ROCK CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD. vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI CORPORATION Advocate - KOMAL PUNJABI BMC, ,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC — WP/4641/2025

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020058362025

Filing Number

WP/5836/2025

Filing Date

24-Feb-2025

Registration No

WP/4641/2025

Registration Date

26-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad

Bench Type

Division

Category

LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )

Sub-Category

Municipal Corporation ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HI-ROCK CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.

    Adv. PRASHANT PARSURAMPURIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI CORPORATION Advocate - KOMAL PUNJABI BMC, ,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC,KOMAL PUNJABI BMC

  2. 2.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ESTATE DEPARTMENT MCGM, THORUGH MCGM LEGAL DEPARTMENT

    Adv. KOMAL PUNJABI BMC

  3. 3.A1-MAKKAH COOP. HOUSING SOCIETY (PROP.) THROUGH ITS CHIEF PROMOTOR SUDHIR CHAVAN

    Adv. Dalmia Chittesh

  4. 4.NDW REAL ESTATES VENTURES LLP

    Adv. Negandhi Shah Himayatullah

  5. 5.SAVERA CO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY (PROPOSED)

    Adv. Pratik K Shah

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/4641/2025 - Hi-Rock Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. MCGM Court Decision: The Bombay High Court quashed the Municipal Corporation's rejection (dated 18 February 2025) of Hi-Rock Construction's redevelopment proposal, finding the decision-making process violated principles of natural justice and procedural fairness. The court directed MCGM to provide the petitioner a proper hearing on consent requirements before making any final decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak

  6. 22-Dec-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  7. 30-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  8. 30-Sep-2025

    Due Admission - 1

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  9. 08-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  10. 08-Sep-2025

    At 3.30 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

  11. 04-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF

  12. 04-Sep-2025

    At 3.30 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

  13. 03-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Smt Manjusha Ajay DeshpandeView PDF

  14. 03-Sep-2025

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  15. 13-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  16. 01-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  17. 01-Aug-2025

    At 3.30 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  18. 24-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  19. 24-Jul-2025

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  20. 23-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  21. 23-Jul-2025

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  22. 16-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  23. 16-Jul-2025

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  24. 09-Jul-2025

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  25. 07-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  26. 07-Jul-2025

    High On Board (Hob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  27. 23-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  28. 23-Jun-2025

    High On Board -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  29. 16-Jun-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  30. 15-Apr-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

  31. 08-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

  32. 25-Mar-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

  33. 25-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 24-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4641/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/4641/2025 - Hi-Rock Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. MCGM Court Decision: The Bombay High Court quashed the Municipal Corporation's rejection (dated 18 February 2025) of Hi-Rock Construction's redevelopment proposal, finding the decision-making process violated principles of natural justice and procedural fairness. The court directed MCGM to provide the petitioner a proper hearing on consent requirements before making any final decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case