KAKOLU VENKATESWARA RAO VIJAYPRAKASH YADAV and DEVMANI SHUKLA vs SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY AND 2 ORS. — WP/1398/2020
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 11th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020046922020
Filing Number
WP/722/2020
Filing Date
03-03-2020
Registration No
WP/1398/2020
Registration Date
28-12-2020
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
11th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KAKOLU VENKATESWARA RAO VIJAYPRAKASH YADAV and DEVMANI SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY AND 2 ORS.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
THE DY. CHIEF ENGINEER
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK
A
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2020 | A |
| 11-06-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP 1398/2020 The petitioner sought a direction to the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) to take legal action against respondents based on allegations concerning a Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 07/07/2010 issued to M/s. Drishti Developers for a slum rehabilitation scheme. The High Court of Bombay disposed of the petition, holding that the petitioner's appropriate remedy was to challenge the LOI directly before the competent forum under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, rather than seek indirect relief through a writ petition. The court requested the SRA to examine the petitioner's communication and initiate appropriate action if substance exists in the allegations, while reserving the petitioner's liberty to pursue direct legal challenge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP 1398/2020 The petitioner sought a direction to the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) to take legal action against respondents based on allegations concerning a Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 07/07/2010 issued to M/s. Drishti Developers for a slum rehabilitation scheme. The High Court of Bombay disposed of the petition, holding that the petitioner's appropriate remedy was to challenge the LOI directly before the competent forum under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, rather than seek indirect relief through a writ petition. The court requested the SRA to examine the petitioner's communication and initiate appropriate action if substance exists in the allegations, while reserving the petitioner's liberty to pursue direct legal challenge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts