KAKOLU VENKATESWARA RAO VIJAYPRAKASH YADAV and DEVMANI SHUKLA vs SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY AND 2 ORS. — WP/1398/2020

Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020046922020

Filing Number

WP/722/2020

Filing Date

03-Mar-2020

Registration No

WP/1398/2020

Registration Date

28-Dec-2020

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Slum Areas Act Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAKOLU VENKATESWARA RAO VIJAYPRAKASH YADAV and DEVMANI SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY AND 2 ORS.

  2. 2.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

  3. 3.THE DY. CHIEF ENGINEER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF

    Case Summary: WP 1398/2020 The petitioner sought a direction to the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) to take legal action against respondents based on allegations concerning a Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 07/07/2010 issued to M/s. Drishti Developers for a slum rehabilitation scheme. The High Court of Bombay disposed of the petition, holding that the petitioner's appropriate remedy was to challenge the LOI directly before the competent forum under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, rather than seek indirect relief through a writ petition. The court requested the SRA to examine the petitioner's communication and initiate appropriate action if substance exists in the allegations, while reserving the petitioner's liberty to pursue direct legal challenge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak

  4. 11-Mar-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/1398/2020

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP 1398/2020 The petitioner sought a direction to the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) to take legal action against respondents based on allegations concerning a Letter of Intent (LOI) dated 07/07/2010 issued to M/s. Drishti Developers for a slum rehabilitation scheme. The High Court of Bombay disposed of the petition, holding that the petitioner's appropriate remedy was to challenge the LOI directly before the competent forum under the Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971, rather than seek indirect relief through a writ petition. The court requested the SRA to examine the petitioner's communication and initiate appropriate action if substance exists in the allegations, while reserving the petitioner's liberty to pursue direct legal challenge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case