DINDOSHI SAI SADAN CO.OP.HSG.SOC LTD vs BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (THROUGH THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER) — HCBM20035782026
Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020035782026
Filing Number
WP/3578/2026
Filing Date
02-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Bench Type
Division
Category
ELECTION ( 12 )
Sub-Category
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DINDOSHI SAI SADAN CO.OP.HSG.SOC LTD
Adv. Aditya Ramesh Parmar
Respondent(s)
-
1.BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (THROUGH THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER)
-
2.MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MHADA)
-
3.AGARWAL AND ASSOCIATES BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS
-
4.SANJAY AGARWAL
-
5.SANDEEP HARICHARAN BANSAL
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
20-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
The writ petition was adjourned to 16th June 2026 to allow MHADA time to obtain instructions and file an affidavit-in-reply regarding action taken on the petitioner's complaint about unauthorized construction. The court directed MHADA to take appropriate action against any unauthorized construction by the developer in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Feb-2026
Case filed
The writ petition was adjourned to 16th June 2026 to allow MHADA time to obtain instructions and file an affidavit-in-reply regarding action taken on the petitioner's complaint about unauthorized construction. The court directed MHADA to take appropriate action against any unauthorized construction by the developer in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts