MANOJ RAMNARESH MISHRA vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, — WP/1818/2026
Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020030742026
Filing Number
WP/3074/2026
Filing Date
29-Jan-2026
Registration No
WP/1818/2026
Registration Date
10-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Bench Type
Division
Category
LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )
Sub-Category
Municipal Corporation ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 05-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANOJ RAMNARESH MISHRA
Adv. Akhilesh Upadhyay
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY,
-
2.MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION FOR GREATER MUMBAI
-
3.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY
-
4.THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SRA, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
-
5.KANAKIYA SPACE REALTY PVT LTD., FORMELY KNOWN KANAKIYA BHUMI CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD.
-
6.HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.
-
7.ARK KABUL ARCHITECH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the issuance of Occupancy Certificates to a developer, finding the case involved disputed factual questions. The court directed the SRA's Chief Executive Engineer to consider the petitioner's representation regarding alleged violations of Development Control Rules and the approved plan, and take further action if the grievance has merit, with expeditious handling required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
29-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/1818/2026
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the issuance of Occupancy Certificates to a developer, finding the case involved disputed factual questions. The court directed the SRA's Chief Executive Engineer to consider the petitioner's representation regarding alleged violations of Development Control Rules and the approved plan, and take further action if the grievance has merit, with expeditious handling required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts