SWAYAM REALTORS AND TRADERS LLP vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS GOVERNMENT PLEADER, — WP/3274/2025
Case under Bombay Stamps Act, 1958 Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020022332025
Filing Number
WP/2233/2025
Filing Date
21-01-2025
Registration No
WP/3274/2025
Registration Date
21-08-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SWAYAM REALTORS AND TRADERS LLP
Adv. LITTLE AND COMPANY
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS GOVERNMENT PLEADER,
Adv. ,GP OS 1123
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND CONTROLLER OF STAMPS
Adv. GP OS
DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND CONTROLLER OF STAMPS, MAHARASHTRA STATE
Adv. GP OS
JOINT SUB-REGISTRAR, MUMBAI CITY-I
Adv. GP OS
JT. SUB-REGISTRAR, BORIVALI-II
Adv. GP OS
SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS THROUGH CITY SURVEY OFFICER
Adv. GP OS
CITY SURVEY OFFICER, BORIVALI
Adv. GP OS
TALATHI BORIVALI
Adv. GP OS
KHATAU MAKANJI SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS LIMITED
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
FRESH ADMISSION
DUE ADMISSION - 1
FRESH ADMISSION
DUE ADMISSION - 1
DUE ADMISSION - 1
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-02-2025 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 21-03-2025 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 31-01-2025 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 24-04-2025 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 02-05-2025 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
Orders
Summary of WP/3274/2025 - Swayam Realtors & Traders LLP vs. State of Maharashtra Decision: The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition, directing registration authorities to accept and register BIFR orders transferring industrial company properties to the petitioner, holding that statutory limitation periods must be computed from when documents become legally capable of registration (after stamp duty adjudication completion), not from original execution dates. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the state's limitation defense under Registration Act Sections 23-25, finding the 17-year delay was state-induced through non-compliance with binding BIFR directions rather than petitioner negligence, and that documents under stamp adjudication cannot legally be registered, so limitation cannot run during such proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of WP/3274/2025 - Swayam Realtors & Traders LLP vs. State of Maharashtra Decision: The Bombay High Court allowed the writ petition, directing registration authorities to accept and register BIFR orders transferring industrial company properties to the petitioner, holding that statutory limitation periods must be computed from when documents become legally capable of registration (after stamp duty adjudication completion), not from original execution dates. Key Reasoning: The court rejected the state's limitation defense under Registration Act Sections 23-25, finding the 17-year delay was state-induced through non-compliance with binding BIFR directions rather than petitioner negligence, and that documents under stamp adjudication cannot legally be registered, so limitation cannot run during such proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts