MOHAMMED KAIF QUESHI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — ABA/3361/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010628932025

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

Filing Number

ABA/24768/2025

Filing Date

04-12-2025

Registration No

ABA/3361/2025

Registration Date

04-12-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Anticipatory ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 420,406,34
Mah. Protection of Interests of Depositors Section 3

Petitioner(s)

MOHAMMED KAIF QUESHI

Adv. Mohammed Junaid Qureshi ,SATISH MULEY,SATISH MULEY, ,SATISH MULEY

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE

08-12-2025

HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)

22-06-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

28-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION /HEARING

26-03-2026

FOR ADMISSION /HEARING

23-02-2026

FOR ADMISSION /HEARING

Orders

08-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ASHWIN D. BHOBE

Case Summary: ABA/3361/2025 The High Court of Bombay adjourned Mohammed Kaif Queshi's anticipatory bail application after granting leave to add the informant/complainant as party Respondent No. 2. The applicant was given four weeks to amend the prayer clause, with notice to be issued thereafter, returnable on 22 June 2026. No substantive decision on bail was made at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: ABA/3361/2025 The High Court of Bombay adjourned Mohammed Kaif Queshi's anticipatory bail application after granting leave to add the informant/complainant as party Respondent No. 2. The applicant was given four weeks to amend the prayer clause, with notice to be issued thereafter, returnable on 22 June 2026. No substantive decision on bail was made at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case