DILIPRAO DATTATRAY MOHITE vs MR.ASHWIN LODHA AUTHORIZED RPRESENTATIVE OF PHOENIX REALTORS PVT.LTD. AND ANR. — IA/13445/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 96. Next hearing: : -.

CNR: HCBM010555442025

Next Hearing

: -

Filing Number

IA/34724/2025

Filing Date

17-10-2025

Registration No

IA/13445/2025

Registration Date

24-11-2025

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

Against Order of Civil Court - Single Bench ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 96

Petitioner(s)

DILIPRAO DATTATRAY MOHITE

Adv. MALVANKAR SUNIL B

Respondent(s)

MR.ASHWIN LODHA AUTHORIZED RPRESENTATIVE OF PHOENIX REALTORS PVT.LTD. AND ANR.

M/S.TOPWORTH PIPES AND TUBES PVT LTD.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

14-01-2026

FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)

07-05-2026

FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)

22-04-2026

FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)

11-03-2026

FOR ORDERS (REGULAR)

Orders

06-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Summary: IA 13445/2025 The Bombay High Court (Judge Sharmila U. Deshmukh) heard the interim application in Diliprao Dattatray Mohite's First Appeal against Phoenix Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and another on May 6, 2026. The court adjourned the matter, ordering service of notice upon the respondents and stood over the case to June 17, 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: IA 13445/2025 The Bombay High Court (Judge Sharmila U. Deshmukh) heard the interim application in Diliprao Dattatray Mohite's First Appeal against Phoenix Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and another on May 6, 2026. The court adjourned the matter, ordering service of notice upon the respondents and stood over the case to June 17, 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case