MUKUND BHIKOBA BORKAR vs MANASI MILND JOSHI AND ORS Advocate - Vaibhav P Patankar, ,Sachin H Deokar — REVN/503/2013
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 397. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010486552013
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
REVN/491/2013
Filing Date
28-11-2013
Registration No
REVN/503/2013
Registration Date
13-12-2013
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MUKUND BHIKOBA BORKAR
Adv. Sudhir Sadavarte
Respondent(s)
MANASI MILND JOSHI AND ORS Advocate - Vaibhav P Patankar, ,Sachin H Deokar
MILIND MADHUKAR JOSHI
DEEPAK SHASHIKANT PATWARDHAN
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE
FOR ORDERS (CONDONATION OF DELAY) [CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS]
FOR ADMISSION /HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-12-2013 | FOR ORDERS (CONDONATION OF DELAY) [CRIMINAL SIDE MATTERS] |
| 05-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION /HEARING |
| 23-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 05-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 23-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Orders
Case Summary: REVN 503/2013 The Bombay High Court heard a Criminal Revision Application by Mukund Bhikoba Borkar challenging an order requiring him to face charges under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and IPC sections 406 and 420, along with a related Criminal Writ Petition. The court directed both matters to proceed ("Rule in both matters") with parties' service waived. The court clarified that pendency of these proceedings shall not stay criminal trial court proceedings or constitute grounds for adjournment, while noting earlier mediation attempts between parties remained unsuccessful. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: REVN 503/2013 The Bombay High Court heard a Criminal Revision Application by Mukund Bhikoba Borkar challenging an order requiring him to face charges under the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 and IPC sections 406 and 420, along with a related Criminal Writ Petition. The court directed both matters to proceed ("Rule in both matters") with parties' service waived. The court clarified that pendency of these proceedings shall not stay criminal trial court proceedings or constitute grounds for adjournment, while noting earlier mediation attempts between parties remained unsuccessful. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts