MRS. NEELA SUDHIR SHAH vs SEJAL PARESH KUVADIA AND ORS. — AO/272/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 96. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 30th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010423792025

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

AO/26911/2025

Filing Date

02-08-2025

Registration No

AO/272/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

30th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 96
Co-operative Societies Act (Maharashtra) Section 96

Petitioner(s)

MRS. NEELA SUDHIR SHAH

Adv. Rohit Shetty

Respondent(s)

SEJAL PARESH KUVADIA AND ORS.

TANNU MAHESH KEVALRAMANI

MEHUL SUDHIR SHAH

Adv. Shahrukh Shaikh

MANGAL MILAN CO-OPERATIVE HOSING SOCIETY LTD.

Adv. P VAS AND CO

P.R. LANDMARK LLP,

Adv. Mayur Vinod Faria

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

11-08-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

01-12-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

06-01-2026

FOR ADMISSION

29-01-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

23-04-2026

FOR ORDERS (DUE MATTERS)

Orders

30-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV

The High Court of Bombay allowed Mrs. Neela Sudhir Shah's appeal and ordered immediate handover of a redeveloped flat to her, despite a pending dispute with her two daughters over property shares. The court appointed a receiver and directed the trial court to expedite proceedings to determine final entitlements, allowing the plaintiff to hold the flat as court receiver's agent until the inheritance dispute is resolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay allowed Mrs. Neela Sudhir Shah's appeal and ordered immediate handover of a redeveloped flat to her, despite a pending dispute with her two daughters over property shares. The court appointed a receiver and directed the trial court to expedite proceedings to determine final entitlements, allowing the plaintiff to hold the flat as court receiver's agent until the inheritance dispute is resolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case