RUSTOM SALAMAT IRANI DR. AVINASH SHIVADE vs SAHIB H. LALWANI — WP/4136/2002

Case under Rent Act. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Next hearing 08-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM010356612001

Filing Number

WP/46941/2001

Filing Date

20-Dec-2001

Registration No

WP/4136/2002

Registration Date

06-Aug-2002

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Rent Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RUSTOM SALAMAT IRANI DR. AVINASH SHIVADE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAHIB H. LALWANI

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jul-2026

    For Dismissal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

    In Writ Petition No. 4136 of 2002 before the Bombay High Court between Rustom Salamat Irani and Sahib H. Lalwani, the case was adjourned on 15th April 2026. The court ordered to "await service" and directed the matter to stand over to 08/07/2026, with neither party represented during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Rent Act - Dismissal

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    For Final Hearing -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

  8. 02-Feb-2026

    For Final Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

  9. 21-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF

  10. 31-Jan-2003

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 20-Dec-2001

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4136/2002

casestatus.in Summary

In Writ Petition No. 4136 of 2002 before the Bombay High Court between Rustom Salamat Irani and Sahib H. Lalwani, the case was adjourned on 15th April 2026. The court ordered to "await service" and directed the matter to stand over to 08/07/2026, with neither party represented during the hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case