MONARCH ORCHID CO OP. HSG. SOC. LTD THRU. SECRETARY vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. SECRETARY AND ORS — WP/8034/2025

Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section NA. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010288372025

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/18394/2025

Filing Date

22-05-2025

Registration No

WP/8034/2025

Registration Date

19-06-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Cooperative Socities ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

MONARCH ORCHID CO OP. HSG. SOC. LTD THRU. SECRETARY

Adv. Vikas Somawanshi

Respondent(s)

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. SECRETARY AND ORS

THE LD. JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCITIES (CIDCO) NAVI MUMBAI

THE LD. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (CIDCO) NAVI MUMBAI

MAKRAND SHIRKANT PADALKAR

Adv. Akash Tayade,YASH BANGAR

LEENA MAKRAND PADALKAR

Adv. Akash Tayade,YASH BANGAR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

18-06-2025

OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED

24-06-2025

FRESH ADMISSION

15-06-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

14-01-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

16-10-2025

DUE ADMISSION - 1

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Case Summary: WP/8034/2025 SKIP The court order document provided contains only the case header, caption page, and procedural information (counsel names, date, judge name) but does not contain the actual judgment or order outcome. The substantive ruling on the writ petition and interim applications is not included in the document pages provided. Therefore, it is not possible to summarize what was ordered without the actual judgment text. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/8034/2025 SKIP The court order document provided contains only the case header, caption page, and procedural information (counsel names, date, judge name) but does not contain the actual judgment or order outcome. The substantive ruling on the writ petition and interim applications is not included in the document pages provided. Therefore, it is not possible to summarize what was ordered without the actual judgment text. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case