THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI vs SHRI. BABULAL P. BOHRA AND ORS. Advocate - D P SINGH, FOR RSPONDENT NO. 2 — HCBM10279552018

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 218D. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

Next hearing 02-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM010279552018

Filing Number

FA/17767/2018

Filing Date

21-Jun-2018

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

Against Order of Civil Court - Single Bench ( 7 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 02-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 218D

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI

    Adv. JERNOLD JOSEPH XAVIER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI. BABULAL P. BOHRA AND ORS. Advocate - D P SINGH, FOR RSPONDENT NO. 2

  2. 2.SMT. SHANTABEN BABULAL BOHRA

  3. 3.RAGHUVANSHI MILLS LIMITED

  4. 4.M/S S.S.G. REALTORS and DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.

Case History

  1. 02-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

    SUMMARY The Bombay High Court dismissed approximately 26 civil applications filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai seeking to condone delays ranging from 1 to 9 years in appealing orders that quashed demolition notices for illegal structures. The court found no "sufficient cause" to condone the delay, rejecting the Corporation's argument that internal officer negligence and the 2017 Kamla Mills incident justified the massive delay. However, the court granted liberty to the Corporation to conduct fresh inspections and initiate new action based on current illegalities, while directing it to complete pending departmental proceedings against officers and superiors within four months and file a compliance report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    First On Board (Fob)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  7. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

  8. 18-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain

  10. 24-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF

  11. 26-Sep-2025

    For Orders (Due Matters)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye

  12. 04-Apr-2025

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  13. 03-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  14. 21-Oct-2021

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Surendra Pandharinath TavadeView PDF

  15. 25-Sep-2018

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-JoshiView PDF

  16. 06-Sep-2018

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-JoshiView PDF

  17. 29-Jun-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 21-Jun-2018

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The Bombay High Court dismissed approximately 26 civil applications filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai seeking to condone delays ranging from 1 to 9 years in appealing orders that quashed demolition notices for illegal structures. The court found no "sufficient cause" to condone the delay, rejecting the Corporation's argument that internal officer negligence and the 2017 Kamla Mills incident justified the massive delay. However, the court granted liberty to the Corporation to conduct fresh inspections and initiate new action based on current illegalities, while directing it to complete pending departmental proceedings against officers and superiors within four months and file a compliance report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case