BOMBAY SUBURBAN ELECTRICAL SUPPLY LTD. SHRI. D. S. SAKHALKAR AND SATISH KAMAT vs PHOOLCHAND R. GUPTA — CAW/2035/2010
Case under Other Act. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010263932010
Filing Number
CAW/18129/2010
Filing Date
20-Jul-2010
Registration No
CAW/2035/2010
Registration Date
02-Aug-2010
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BOMBAY SUBURBAN ELECTRICAL SUPPLY LTD. SHRI. D. S. SAKHALKAR AND SATISH KAMAT
Respondent(s)
-
1.PHOOLCHAND R. GUPTA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Bombay Suburban Electrical Supply Ltd. for want of prosecution on 15 June 2026. The petition, originally admitted in March 2005 and challenging trial court findings on jurisdiction, remained pending for over 20 years with the petitioner failing to comply with court directives regarding amendments and ultimately not appearing for the final dismissal hearing. All pending applications were also dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Feb-2013
Judges Order
Hon'ble Shri Justice B.R. Gavai
-
19-Nov-2010
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice D.B. Bhosale
-
13-Oct-2010
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice J.H. Bhatia
-
05-Oct-2010
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
-
27-Aug-2010
For Orders
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Oka
-
13-Aug-2010
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jul-2010
Case filed
Registration No. CAW/2035/2010
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Bombay Suburban Electrical Supply Ltd. for want of prosecution on 15 June 2026. The petition, originally admitted in March 2005 and challenging trial court findings on jurisdiction, remained pending for over 20 years with the petitioner failing to comply with court directives regarding amendments and ultimately not appearing for the final dismissal hearing. All pending applications were also dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts