MR.SATISH YASHWANT MANE THR HIS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY SADANAND B HIGDE vs SURU CONSULTATANTS PVT. LTD. Advocate - R V and Co — CRA/278/2025
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section 115. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th October 2025.
CNR: HCBM010240592025
Filing Number
CRA/15316/2025
Filing Date
25-04-2025
Registration No
CRA/278/2025
Registration Date
06-05-2025
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
RENT ACT ( 34 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
07th October 2025
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MR.SATISH YASHWANT MANE THR HIS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY SADANAND B HIGDE
Adv. R A Dubey
Respondent(s)
SURU CONSULTATANTS PVT. LTD. Advocate - R V and Co
MRS. RAJNIGANDHA @ RITA SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MADHAV J. JAMDAR
FRESH ADMISSION
HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)
HIGH ON BOARD -
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2025 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 07-10-2025 | HIGH ON BOARD (HOB) |
| 06-10-2025 | HIGH ON BOARD - |
| 18-11-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 23-09-2025 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court allowed Satish Yashwant Mane's interim application, permitting him to install an entrance door at the disputed premises (Rooms 102/103) at his own cost after the door was allegedly removed. The court also found that Respondent No.2 (Mrs. Rajnigandha Singh) deliberately blocked her room's entrance and ordered her to open an alternative separate entrance to Room No.104 from the passage, while prohibiting her from using the applicant's premises for access. Compliance was scheduled for 15 June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court allowed Satish Yashwant Mane's interim application, permitting him to install an entrance door at the disputed premises (Rooms 102/103) at his own cost after the door was allegedly removed. The court also found that Respondent No.2 (Mrs. Rajnigandha Singh) deliberately blocked her room's entrance and ordered her to open an alternative separate entrance to Room No.104 from the passage, while prohibiting her from using the applicant's premises for access. Compliance was scheduled for 15 June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts