MOHAMMED IMRAN MANSOOR KHAN AND ANR vs ABDULLA SHAMSUDDIN SHAIKH (DECEASED THR. LEGAL HEIR) 1. — WP/6531/2026
Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010234532026
Filing Number
WP/13717/2026
Filing Date
05-05-2026
Registration No
WP/6531/2026
Registration Date
07-05-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
Bench Type
Single
Category
RENT ACT ( 34 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAMMED IMRAN MANSOOR KHAN AND ANR
Adv. J S Tiwari
MOHAMMAD IRSHAD MANSOOR KHAN
Respondent(s)
ABDULLA SHAMSUDDIN SHAIKH (DECEASED THR. LEGAL HEIR) 1.
LALBI ABDULLA SHAIKH1.
MOHD. ANWAR ABDULLA SHAIKH1.
ANIS ABDULLA SHAIKH1.
SHAMSHUDDIN ABDULLA SHAIKH1.
ROSHAN AFROZ ABUL HASSAN
MUNNIBAI D. HUSSAIN AND ORS (DELETED SINDE DECEASD DELETED)(Legal Heir)2.
MOHAMMED DILAWAR HUSSAIN2.
ASHRAF DILWAR HUSSAIN2.
ABDULLA DILAWAR HUSSAIN2.
SALIMA SYED NISAM AHMAD2.
NAGAMA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 08-05-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed the Writ Petition filed by Mohammed Imran Mansoor Khan challenging possession of suit premises. The court held that the petitioner derived rights only through a judgment debtor (Mohammed Parvez Raees) in a chain of transfers from the original tenant, lacking independent possession rights. As the petitioner had already lost physical possession on 7 February 2026, the court found no basis to obstruct the decree and dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed the Writ Petition filed by Mohammed Imran Mansoor Khan challenging possession of suit premises. The court held that the petitioner derived rights only through a judgment debtor (Mohammed Parvez Raees) in a chain of transfers from the original tenant, lacking independent possession rights. As the petitioner had already lost physical possession on 7 February 2026, the court found no basis to obstruct the decree and dismissed the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts