M/S. ORACLE REALTY DEVELOPERS AND ORS. vs MR. THAKARSHI JAVER BHOJANI THR. C.A. HIMMATBHAI M. VIRADIYA AND ORS. — CRA/275/2026
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 115. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010214792026
Filing Number
CRA/12523/2026
Filing Date
27-Apr-2026
Registration No
CRA/275/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
Bench Type
Single
Category
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATIONS ( 67 )
Sub-Category
Against Order of Civil Court (Except under Rent Act) ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S. ORACLE REALTY DEVELOPERS AND ORS.
Adv. MOHD TAHA
-
2.MR. SURESH JADHAV NAKUM PARTNER AT M/S ORACLE REALTY DEVELOPERS
-
3.MR. YOGESH MANSUKHLAL POPAT PARTNER AT M/S ORACLE REALTY DEVELOPRS
Respondent(s)
-
1.MR. THAKARSHI JAVER BHOJANI THR. C.A. HIMMATBHAI M. VIRADIYA AND ORS.
-
2.JAYANT KANUBHAI KAKKAD
-
3.AJAY KANUBHAI KAKKAD
-
4.FALGUNI KETAN SHAH
Case History
-
21-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-Jul-2026
Fresh Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF
Case Summary: CRA 275/2026 The Bombay High Court admitted Oracle Realty Developers' Civil Revision Application on 9th June 2026, finding an arguable case regarding whether the suit is barred by the law of limitation. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 21st July 2026, with ad-interim relief granted pending final hearing. The court allowed private service of notice with affidavit filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRA/275/2026
Case Summary: CRA 275/2026 The Bombay High Court admitted Oracle Realty Developers' Civil Revision Application on 9th June 2026, finding an arguable case regarding whether the suit is barred by the law of limitation. Notice was issued to respondents returnable on 21st July 2026, with ad-interim relief granted pending final hearing. The court allowed private service of notice with affidavit filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts