GAJANAN NARAYAN CHAVAN vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS — WP/6094/2026
Case under The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 06th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010210552026
Filing Number
WP/12264/2026
Filing Date
24-04-2026
Registration No
WP/6094/2026
Registration Date
30-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GAJANAN NARAYAN CHAVAN
Adv. PREETI WALIMBE
SANTOSH MAROTI RATHOD
KIRAN HARIBHAU PATHOD
YOGESHWAR YASHWANT JAGTAP
BALOO DIPAK RATHOD
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS DEPARTMENT
THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (PRIMARY) PUNE
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PALGHAR ZILLA PARISHAD PALGHAR
THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY) ZILLA PARISHAD PALGHAR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
FOR DISPOSAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | FOR DISPOSAL |
Orders
Summary of WP/6094/2026 The High Court of Bombay disposed of the petition filed by Gajanan Narayan Chavan and others against the State of Maharashtra, finding that a prior judgment from the Aurangabad Bench (WP 2771/2026) had already settled the identical issue applicable to all Zilla Parishad CEOs. The court directed that a message be conveyed to all Zilla Parishads ensuring compliance with court orders, and the Zilla Parishad's counsel affirmed satisfaction with this resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of WP/6094/2026 The High Court of Bombay disposed of the petition filed by Gajanan Narayan Chavan and others against the State of Maharashtra, finding that a prior judgment from the Aurangabad Bench (WP 2771/2026) had already settled the identical issue applicable to all Zilla Parishad CEOs. The court directed that a message be conveyed to all Zilla Parishads ensuring compliance with court orders, and the Zilla Parishad's counsel affirmed satisfaction with this resolution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts