SARASWAT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. vs SAYEEDABANO NAWAZALI CHOUDHARY — WP/5905/2026

Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section NA. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010206272026

Next Hearing

22nd June 2026

Filing Number

WP/12020/2026

Filing Date

22-04-2026

Registration No

WP/5905/2026

Registration Date

29-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Bench Type

Division

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

SARASWAT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.

Adv. V DESHPANDE AND COMPANY

Respondent(s)

SAYEEDABANO NAWAZALI CHOUDHARY

YATISH B. SAMANT

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

05-05-2026

FRESH ADMISSION

22-06-2026

HIGH ON BOARD -

Orders

05-05-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT

Case Summary: The writ petition filed by Saraswat Co-operative Bank Ltd. was adjourned to 22.06.2026. The court directed the respondent to file a reply affidavit within four weeks and permitted a rejoinder affidavit within two weeks thereafter. As an interim measure, the respondent undertook not to create any third-party rights in the secured asset (flats 201-202, 1109 sq ft, Malad, Mumbai) until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The writ petition filed by Saraswat Co-operative Bank Ltd. was adjourned to 22.06.2026. The court directed the respondent to file a reply affidavit within four weeks and permitted a rejoinder affidavit within two weeks thereafter. As an interim measure, the respondent undertook not to create any third-party rights in the secured asset (flats 201-202, 1109 sq ft, Malad, Mumbai) until the next hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case