MOHAMMAD SABIR ABDUL RASHID SHAIKH vs CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CANTONMENT BOARD, KIRKEE AND ORS Advocate - DEEPAK LAD — WP/8919/2022
Case under Cantonments Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 02nd April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010190162022
Filing Number
WP/11209/2022
Filing Date
02-May-2022
Registration No
WP/8919/2022
Registration Date
25-Jul-2022
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
Bench Type
Division
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 03-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MOHAMMAD SABIR ABDUL RASHID SHAIKH
Adv. Niranjan Mogre
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CANTONMENT BOARD, KIRKEE AND ORS Advocate - DEEPAK LAD
-
2.Prakash Shamroa Suryawanshi
Adv. Rekha Musale
-
3.Hajarabi Dadamiya Mujawar
-
4.Jainabee Imam Shaikh
-
5.Digambar Pira Devkule
-
6.Shaikh Adbul Sattar Abdul Raheman
-
7.Shantabai Kundlik Devkule
-
8.Nurbi Mohammad House Singoti
-
9.Suryakant Gulab Sakpal
-
10.Sayyad Sameer Rafique
-
11.Ram Shankar Piwal
-
12.Shantabai Babu Sangela
-
13.Janabai Sakat
-
14.Leelabai Shankar Jagtap on behalf of Shankar Govind Jagtap(deceased)
-
15.Laxman Shankar Pival
-
16.Shantabai Badri Sasar
-
17.Kishore Chotu Sangela
-
18.Hasumati Kishore Sangela
-
19.Noorjaha Yakub Shaikh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition without expressing any opinion on merits, finding that the petitioner's claims are better addressed through pending civil litigation (Suit No.1753 of 2015) where he can seek to be added as a party-defendant, and by filing a separate application for lease renewal before the competent authority. The court directed the competent authority to decide any lease renewal application within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. Ankhad
-
30-Jan-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam A. AnkhadView PDF
-
18-Aug-2025
Final Hearing (For Direction)
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni , Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
-
13-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
06-Sep-2024
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
06-Sep-2024
Final Hearing (For Direction)
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata , Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak
-
30-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
30-Aug-2024
Final Hearing (For Direction)
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata , Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak
-
23-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
23-Aug-2024
Final Hearing (For Direction)
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata , Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak
-
16-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata,hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF
-
02-Feb-2023
For Circulation
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor , Hon'ble Shri Justice S.V. Gangapurwala
-
29-Nov-2022
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor,hon'ble Shri Justice S.V. GangapurwalaView PDF
-
07-Oct-2022
For Admission
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata , Hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka
-
30-Aug-2022
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata,hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. DhanukaView PDF
-
30-Aug-2022
Due Admission -
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata , Hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka
-
01-Aug-2022
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata,hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. DhanukaView PDF
-
01-Aug-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-May-2022
Case filed
Registration No. WP/8919/2022
The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition without expressing any opinion on merits, finding that the petitioner's claims are better addressed through pending civil litigation (Suit No.1753 of 2015) where he can seek to be added as a party-defendant, and by filing a separate application for lease renewal before the competent authority. The court directed the competent authority to decide any lease renewal application within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts