Mehvish Salim Mansuri Naqeeb Gadhwala vs Shahbaz Farook Mansuri — CP/246/2026
Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 12. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
CNR: HCBM010167582026
Next Hearing
01st July 2026
e-Filing Number
02-04-2026
Filing Number
CP/9708/2026
Filing Date
04-04-2026
Registration No
CP/246/2026
Registration Date
20-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDESH DADASAHEB PATIL
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDESH DADASAHEB PATIL
Bench Type
Division
Category
CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )
Sub-Category
CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mehvish Salim Mansuri Naqeeb Gadhwala
Respondent(s)
Shahbaz Farook Mansuri
Adv. ,Usman Memon,Usman Memon,Usman Memon,Usman Memon,Usman Memon 1123
Hanifa Wo Late Farook Mansuri
Juned Farook Mansuri
Halima Wo Juned Mansuri
Hina Mansuri Wo Asif Mansuri
State of Maharashtra Through Public Prosecutor
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SARANG VIJAYKUMAR KOTWAL , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDESH DADASAHEB PATIL
FOR CIRCULATION
DUE ADMISSION - 1
DUE ADMISSION - 1
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 01-07-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 05-05-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 30-04-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
Case Summary: CP/246/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to 1st July, 2026. Petitioner alleged respondent No.1 violated the October 3, 2025 court order by failing to pay Rs.10,000 monthly for their daughter's maintenance (arrears of Rs.70,000). The court warned that non-compliance could result in reviving the original criminal proceedings. However, respondent's counsel tendered a demand draft of Rs.50,000 during hearing. The court accepted partial payment and adjourned proceedings, reiterating that respondent must honor his court-recorded commitment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CP/246/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to 1st July, 2026. Petitioner alleged respondent No.1 violated the October 3, 2025 court order by failing to pay Rs.10,000 monthly for their daughter's maintenance (arrears of Rs.70,000). The court warned that non-compliance could result in reviving the original criminal proceedings. However, respondent's counsel tendered a demand draft of Rs.50,000 during hearing. The court accepted partial payment and adjourned proceedings, reiterating that respondent must honor his court-recorded commitment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts