RACHANA TUSHAR PATIL vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — CP/400/2024

Case under Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 159. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010154352024

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

16-03-2024

Filing Number

CP/8823/2024

Filing Date

20-03-2024

Registration No

CP/400/2024

Registration Date

24-07-2024

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Bench Type

Division

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )

Sub-Category

CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Court Act 1971 Section 159

Petitioner(s)

RACHANA TUSHAR PATIL

Adv. Ashwini Bandiwadekar

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

THE EDUCATION INSPECTOR,

MOTIRAM S. VISHWASRAO

JAGDISH SURYAWANSHI

Adv. P V DHOPATKAR

JITENDRA DATTARARN PAWAR

Adv. Mihir Govilkar,MIHIR RAJSHEKHAR GOVILKAR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

02-08-2024

FRESH ADMISSION

17-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION

07-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION

26-02-2026

FOR ADMISSION

25-02-2026

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

The Bombay High Court disposed of Rachana Tushar Patil's contempt petition after respondent No.4 deposited Rs.26,69,342/- (after tax deduction) for withdrawal and committed to paying her salary prospectively according to the pay scale. With both parties accepting the settlement, the court found no further need to proceed with the contempt petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of Rachana Tushar Patil's contempt petition after respondent No.4 deposited Rs.26,69,342/- (after tax deduction) for withdrawal and committed to paying her salary prospectively according to the pay scale. With both parties accepting the settlement, the court found no further need to proceed with the contempt petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case