Rare Township Pvt Ltd SNG and Partners vs Saji Mathews — SA/144/2026
Case under Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Section 58. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010133142026
e-Filing Number
16-03-2026
Filing Number
SA/7697/2026
Filing Date
16-03-2026
Registration No
SA/144/2026
Registration Date
18-03-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rare Township Pvt Ltd SNG and Partners
Respondent(s)
Saji Mathews
Simmy Saji
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 15-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed a real estate promoter's appeal, upholding that allottees are entitled to interest on delayed flat possession under RERA 2016 Section 18, even when delays result from regulatory approvals or statutory restrictions. The court rejected the promoter's force majeure and moratorium defenses, finding that ordinary development delays cannot qualify as force majeure, and that the agreed possession date predated COVID-19 by 15 months, making pandemic moratorium unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed a real estate promoter's appeal, upholding that allottees are entitled to interest on delayed flat possession under RERA 2016 Section 18, even when delays result from regulatory approvals or statutory restrictions. The court rejected the promoter's force majeure and moratorium defenses, finding that ordinary development delays cannot qualify as force majeure, and that the agreed possession date predated COVID-19 by 15 months, making pandemic moratorium unjustified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts