ANIL GAJANAN MANE SHRI. NITIN A. KULKARNI vs THE THANE JANATA SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED Advocate - GUNJAN DEEPAK THAKKAR — WP/2901/2011

Case under M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 13-Apr-2011

CNR: HCBM010113592011

Filing Number

WP/8053/2011

Filing Date

23-Mar-2011

Registration No

WP/2901/2011

Registration Date

08-Apr-2011

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

M.r.t.u. & P.u.l.p. Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIL GAJANAN MANE SHRI. NITIN A. KULKARNI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE THANE JANATA SAHAKARI BANK LIMITED Advocate - GUNJAN DEEPAK THAKKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/2901/2011 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition and upheld the Industrial Court's order granting Rs. 2,00,000 lump sum compensation instead of reinstatement. The petitioner, a bank peon with ~3 years service whose wrongful termination was established, cannot be reinstated due to: (1) lengthy 11+ year litigation delay, (2) employer bank's 2007 merger reducing staffing needs, and (3) short service period. While acknowledging the violation of labor law and prior permanency grant, the court found compensation a more practical remedy given changed circumstances, rejecting the argument that compensation rewards employer misconduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  8. 06-Feb-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  9. 16-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

  10. 15-Sep-2025

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  11. 25-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  12. 25-Aug-2025

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  13. 11-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  14. 11-Aug-2025

    For Hearing

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  15. 28-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  16. 28-Jul-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

  17. 14-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  18. 12-Jul-2013

    For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated

  19. 21-Jun-2013

    For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated

  20. 13-Apr-2011

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. TatedView PDF

  21. 13-Apr-2011

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 23-Mar-2011

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/2901/2011

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/2901/2011 Court Decision: The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition and upheld the Industrial Court's order granting Rs. 2,00,000 lump sum compensation instead of reinstatement. The petitioner, a bank peon with ~3 years service whose wrongful termination was established, cannot be reinstated due to: (1) lengthy 11+ year litigation delay, (2) employer bank's 2007 merger reducing staffing needs, and (3) short service period. While acknowledging the violation of labor law and prior permanency grant, the court found compensation a more practical remedy given changed circumstances, rejecting the argument that compensation rewards employer misconduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case