SAVITA PRAKASH MAYEKAR SHRI.SATISH KALKE, SHRI.T.G.TONDAPURKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — REVN/577/2002
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 397. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010029222002
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
REVN/577/2002
Filing Date
21-12-2002
Registration No
REVN/577/2002
Registration Date
21-12-2002
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAVITA PRAKASH MAYEKAR SHRI.SATISH KALKE, SHRI.T.G.TONDAPURKAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. SHRI A.S RAO FOR R.NO.2 1123
SHAKUNTALA UMAKANT BAUSKAR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. M. SATHAYE
FOR ORDER [OFFICE OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED]
DUE ADMISSION - 1
FOR ADMISSION /HEARING
FOR HEARING
FOR HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-10-2006 | FOR ORDER [OFFICE OBJECTIONS NOT REMOVED] |
| 29-06-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 05-05-2026 | FOR ADMISSION /HEARING |
| 24-04-2026 | FOR HEARING |
| 06-03-2026 | FOR HEARING |
Orders
Summary: In Criminal Revision Application No. 577/2002, the Bombay High Court adjourned the matter to June 29, 2026 for further consideration. The applicant Savita Prakash Mayekar sought relief regarding a criminal conviction under the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963. The court noted that parties had executed consent terms settling the dispute, with the respondent complainant agreeing not to pursue a pending criminal appeal in exchange for payment and flat possession. The applicant was directed to file an affidavit by June 22, 2026, substantiating delivery of flat possession with supporting documents, while the respondent was directed to file an affidavit regarding service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Criminal Revision Application No. 577/2002, the Bombay High Court adjourned the matter to June 29, 2026 for further consideration. The applicant Savita Prakash Mayekar sought relief regarding a criminal conviction under the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963. The court noted that parties had executed consent terms settling the dispute, with the respondent complainant agreeing not to pursue a pending criminal appeal in exchange for payment and flat possession. The applicant was directed to file an affidavit by June 22, 2026, substantiating delivery of flat possession with supporting documents, while the respondent was directed to file an affidavit regarding service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts