SAVITA PRAKASH MAYEKAR SHRI.SATISH KALKE, SHRI.T.G.TONDAPURKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — REVN/577/2002
Case under Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.pc) Section 397. Status: Due Admission - 1. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010029222002
Filing Number
REVN/577/2002
Filing Date
21-Dec-2002
Registration No
REVN/577/2002
Registration Date
21-Dec-2002
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
Bench Type
Single
Category
CRIMINAL ( 9 )
Sub-Category
( 9 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAVITA PRAKASH MAYEKAR SHRI.SATISH KALKE, SHRI.T.G.TONDAPURKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Adv. SHRI A.S RAO FOR R.NO.2 1123
-
2.SHAKUNTALA UMAKANT BAUSKAR
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
Summary: In Criminal Revision Application No. 577/2002, the Bombay High Court adjourned the matter to June 29, 2026 for further consideration. The applicant Savita Prakash Mayekar sought relief regarding a criminal conviction under the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963. The court noted that parties had executed consent terms settling the dispute, with the respondent complainant agreeing not to pursue a pending criminal appeal in exchange for payment and flat possession. The applicant was directed to file an affidavit by June 22, 2026, substantiating delivery of flat possession with supporting documents, while the respondent was directed to file an affidavit regarding service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Admission /Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. Sathaye
-
24-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. M. SathayeView PDF
-
24-Apr-2026
For Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
-
06-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
For Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
-
16-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
-
03-Feb-2026
For Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
-
19-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
For Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak
-
06-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shyam C. ChandakView PDF
-
06-Nov-2025
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. Laddha
-
18-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. N. LaddhaView PDF
-
10-Dec-2024
For Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
03-Dec-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
03-Dec-2024
For Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
26-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
26-Nov-2024
For Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav
-
19-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
-
18-Jul-2022
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prakash D. Naik
-
27-Jun-2022
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prakash D. Naik
-
01-Feb-2021
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. GadkariView PDF
-
03-Sep-2020
For Final Hearing
According To Sitting List
-
19-Mar-2020
Hon'ble Shri Justice C.V. BhadangView PDF
-
20-Feb-2020
Hon'ble Smt. Justice S.S. JadhavView PDF
-
20-Feb-2020
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Smt. Justice S.S. Jadhav
-
30-Nov-2018
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar KotwalView PDF
-
30-Nov-2018
For Final Hearing
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal
-
13-Oct-2006
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Dec-2002
Case filed
Registration No. REVN/577/2002
Summary: In Criminal Revision Application No. 577/2002, the Bombay High Court adjourned the matter to June 29, 2026 for further consideration. The applicant Savita Prakash Mayekar sought relief regarding a criminal conviction under the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963. The court noted that parties had executed consent terms settling the dispute, with the respondent complainant agreeing not to pursue a pending criminal appeal in exchange for payment and flat possession. The applicant was directed to file an affidavit by June 22, 2026, substantiating delivery of flat possession with supporting documents, while the respondent was directed to file an affidavit regarding service of notice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts