JOINT VENTURE OF M/S S.N. ENTERPRISES AND M/S SOUTH EAST ARCHITECTS AND BUILDERS AND 2 ORS vs UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS Advocate - CGSC — WP(C)/197/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 27th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: GAHC020006332025

Filing Number

WP(C)/480/2025

Filing Date

25-Sep-2025

Registration No

WP(C)/197/2025

Registration Date

26-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10180 - Award of contracts by the State or its instrumentalities ( 172 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

27-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JOINT VENTURE OF M/S S.N. ENTERPRISES AND M/S SOUTH EAST ARCHITECTS AND BUILDERS AND 2 ORS

    Adv. SENTIYANGER,YUKHAKOKLA,YUKHAKOKLA, ,V ANNE THERIE,KEVISERIENUO,KONLI BUCHEM,MAONGKALA,NOCKLEI M KONYAK,WAPANGLEMLA,YUKHAKOKLA

  2. 2.M/S S.N. ENTERPRISE

  3. 3.M/S SOUTH EAST ARCHITECHS AND BUILDERS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS Advocate - CGSC

  2. 2.STATE OF NAGALAND

    Adv. GOVT ADV NL

  3. 3.THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY

  4. 4.THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF

  5. 5.THE CHIEF ENGINEER

  6. 6.M/S VERTEX CONSTRUCTION

  7. 7.M/S CHINGKAM PHOM

    Adv. N. LONGKUMER,KIM PIENYU REBECCA LUCY WEO R SEMY N. LONGKUMER (R-

  8. 8.M/S Z. RULHO

    Adv. APILA SANGTAM,ALIBA OZUKUM APILA SANGTAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Devashis BaruahView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(C)/197/2025 Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioners challenging a tender bid evaluation for highway maintenance work in Nagaland. The petitioners' bid was rejected as technically non-responsive for failing to submit required documents (Appendix-IA, Annexures II-IV), while three competing bids were accepted. The court found no merit in the petitioners' claim of unfair treatment, holding that the other bidders either submitted complete documents within deadlines or had minor deficiencies curable under contract provisions. The court rejected the petitioners' Article 14 equality argument, finding the evaluation process applied consistent standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana

  4. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai SuranaView PDF

  5. 30-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla Longkumer

  6. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF

  7. 01-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah

  8. 24-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Devashis BaruahView PDF

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Devashis Baruah

  10. 19-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Devashis BaruahView PDF

  11. 10-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti Saikia

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Parthivjyoti SaikiaView PDF

  13. 17-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Michael Zothankhuma

  14. 12-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Michael ZothankhumaView PDF

  15. 10-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Robin Phukan

  16. 20-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Robin PhukanView PDF

  17. 01-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Mitali Thakuria

  18. 08-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Mitali ThakuriaView PDF

  19. 08-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair

  20. 25-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan NairView PDF

  21. 24-Nov-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Medhi

  22. 03-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MedhiView PDF

  23. 24-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  24. 26-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Yarenjungla LongkumerView PDF

  25. 25-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/197/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(C)/197/2025 Court Decision: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioners challenging a tender bid evaluation for highway maintenance work in Nagaland. The petitioners' bid was rejected as technically non-responsive for failing to submit required documents (Appendix-IA, Annexures II-IV), while three competing bids were accepted. The court found no merit in the petitioners' claim of unfair treatment, holding that the other bidders either submitted complete documents within deadlines or had minor deficiencies curable under contract provisions. The court rejected the petitioners' Article 14 equality argument, finding the evaluation process applied consistent standards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case