THE MANAGEMENT OF ARTFED vs SMTI JYOSHNA BHUYAN AND ANR Advocate - MR. U SAIKIA, ,MS. N UPADHYAY,MR. Z ISLAM,MR. P DAS — WP(C)/230/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: GAHC010290062025
e-Filing Number
30-12-2025
Filing Number
WP(C)/16849/2025
Filing Date
30-Dec-2025
Registration No
WP(C)/230/2026
Registration Date
19-Jan-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
Coram
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
10132 - Other Labour and Industrial Cases. ( 132 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Last updated 01-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE MANAGEMENT OF ARTFED
Adv. MR. A JAHID,MR ARJU IKBAL,MR ARJU IKBAL, ,MR ARJU IKBAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.SMTI JYOSHNA BHUYAN AND ANR Advocate - MR. U SAIKIA, ,MS. N UPADHYAY,MR. Z ISLAM,MR. P DAS
-
2.JAMINI DEKA
-
3.THE PRESIDING OFFICER
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
01-Apr-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF
Summary: The Gauhati High Court case WP(C)/230/2026 was adjourned for four weeks on 01.04.2026. The court allowed the petitioner's prayer to undertake fresh service of notice upon respondents 1 & 2 via speed post within one week, as service upon respondent 3 was already complete. The interim order previously passed shall remain in effect until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Orders
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish Choudhury
-
17-Mar-2026
Deputy Registrar (Bench) - Mr. Saptarshi DasView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Manish ChoudhuryView PDF
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-Jan-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MedhiView PDF
-
21-Jan-2026
Honourable Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar MedhiView PDF
-
30-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/230/2026
Summary: The Gauhati High Court case WP(C)/230/2026 was adjourned for four weeks on 01.04.2026. The court allowed the petitioner's prayer to undertake fresh service of notice upon respondents 1 & 2 via speed post within one week, as service upon respondent 3 was already complete. The interim order previously passed shall remain in effect until the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts