NIT WORKERS UNION AND 3 ORS vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,MR. S P CHOUDHURY,SC, NIT — I.A.(Civil)/3881/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

CNR: GAHC010263722024

Next Hearing

23rd April 2026

Filing Number

I.A.(Civil)/14930/2024

Filing Date

07-12-2024

Registration No

I.A.(Civil)/3881/2024

Registration Date

11-12-2024

Judge

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

Coram

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10301 - Interlocutory Application (Civil) ( 382 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Acts & Sections

CONSTITUTION OF INDIA Section 226

Petitioner(s)

NIT WORKERS UNION AND 3 ORS

Adv. MR. M J BARUAH,MR. A. ALI,MR. A. ALI, ,MR. A K PURKAYASTHA,MR. J SAIKIA,MR. A. ALI

CHAMPA LAL GORH

SAHAB UDDIN LASKAR

MANZURUL HAQUE LASKAR

Respondent(s)

THE UNION OF INDIA AND 4 ORS Advocate - DY.S.G.I., ,MR. S P CHOUDHURY,SC, NIT

THE DIRECTOR,

THE CHAIRMAN

THE REGISTRAR

THE NODAL OFFICER,

Hearing History

Judge: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

23-04-2026

HEARING

10-06-2025

ADMISSION

08-05-2025

- ADMISSION WITH NOTICE SERVED - REPLY NOT FILED -

11-03-2025

- FOR ORDERS -

Orders

23-04-2026
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG

Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court (WP(C)/4853/2024, linked to I.A.(Civil)/3881/2024) heard a petition filed by NIT Workers Union and three individuals against the Union of India and NIT Silchar officials regarding recruitment matters. On 23.04.2026, the court adjourned the hearing for one week on the ground that the petitioners' counsel was in bereavement, with the registry to fix a new hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Gauhati High Court (WP(C)/4853/2024, linked to I.A.(Civil)/3881/2024) heard a petition filed by NIT Workers Union and three individuals against the Union of India and NIT Silchar officials regarding recruitment matters. On 23.04.2026, the court adjourned the hearing for one week on the ground that the petitioners' counsel was in bereavement, with the registry to fix a new hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case