SRI PRASANNA ROY, vs THE UNION OF INDIA and 6 ORS Advocate - ASSTT.S.G.I., ,MR. D BARUAH,C.G.C.,MR. M PHUKAN,MRS. A GAYAN — WP(C)/293/2014

Disposed: Contested--Disposed Of on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Jan-2014

CNR: GAHC010122332014

Filing Number

WP(C)/293/2014

Filing Date

20-Dec-2013

Registration No

WP(C)/293/2014

Registration Date

22-Jan-2014

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10054 - Major punishment with respect to Service of Local Bodies, Banks, State & Central Public Sector Undertaking, Statutory Bodies and Universities and In ( 54 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Of

Last updated 18-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SRI PRASANNA ROY,

    Adv. MR M HAZARIKA,MS.D DEKA,MS.D DEKA, ,M PATHAK,MR. M K BORO,MR. N K KALITA,MRS DIPANJALI BORPUJARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE UNION OF INDIA and 6 ORS Advocate - ASSTT.S.G.I., ,MR. D BARUAH,C.G.C.,MR. M PHUKAN,MRS. A GAYAN

  2. 2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL

  3. 3.THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

  4. 4.THE DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

  5. 5.THE DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

  6. 6.ADDL. DY. INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE

  7. 7.THE COMMANDANT

  8. 8.MINAKSHI ROY,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

    The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the 2006 termination order of a CRPF constable who left training camp due to illness (brain tumor) without authorization and failed to resume duty despite medical fitness certification. The court held that while the termination was technically stigmatic, the respondent authorities were justified in taking action as the employee failed to follow proper procedures for medical leave despite family notifications and became absent for prolonged periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

  4. 03-Feb-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

  5. 19-Aug-2025

    Honourable Mrs. Justice Marli VankungView PDF

  6. 19-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik Goswami

  7. 14-Aug-2025

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kaushik GoswamiView PDF

  8. 05-Jun-2025

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

  9. 08-Feb-2024

    Honourable Mr. Justice Lanusungkum JamirView PDF

  10. 14-Nov-2014

    Honourable Justice B. K. SharmaView PDF

  11. 03-Sep-2014

    Honourable Justice B. K. SharmaView PDF

  12. 21-Jul-2014

    —View PDF

  13. 21-Jul-2014

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice T. VaipheiView PDF

  14. 21-May-2014

    —View PDF

  15. 19-May-2014

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice T. VaipheiView PDF

  16. 12-May-2014

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice T. VaipheiView PDF

  17. 26-Mar-2014

    Honourable Mr. Justice Ujjal BhuyanView PDF

  18. 03-Mar-2014

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice B.P. KatakeyView PDF

  19. 24-Jan-2014

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice T. VaipheiView PDF

  20. 20-Dec-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/293/2014

casestatus.in Summary

The Gauhati High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the 2006 termination order of a CRPF constable who left training camp due to illness (brain tumor) without authorization and failed to resume duty despite medical fitness certification. The court held that while the termination was technically stigmatic, the respondent authorities were justified in taking action as the employee failed to follow proper procedures for medical leave despite family notifications and became absent for prolonged periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case