SHRI SURESHWAR PODDAR vs THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Advocate - GA, ASSAM — WP(C)/2842/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: GAHC010107092026

e-Filing Number

27-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/6123/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/2842/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Coram

Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak Ete

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

10189 - Other Civil Rules relating to other Writ Petitions. ( 247 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRI SURESHWAR PODDAR

    Adv. TAWHID LASKAR,R AMIN,R AMIN, ,S K RAHMATULLAH,R AMIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA Advocate - GA (Government Advocate), ASSAM

  2. 2.INDUSIND BANK LIMITED

  3. 3.HDFC BANK LIMITED BPCL FLEET E COLLECT

  4. 4.IDFC FIRST BANK LIMITED

  5. 5.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, CRIME

  6. 6.OFFICER IN CHARGE

  7. 7.EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT AND PRINCIPAL NODAL OFFICER

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr. Justice Kardak EteView PDF

    Summary of WP(C) /2842/2026 Shri Sureshwar Poddar challenged the RBI Ombudsman's order (dated 20.02.2026) rejecting his complaint regarding premature closure of his fixed deposit at IndusInd Bank and fraudulent transfer of Rs. 6,50,000. The Gauhati High Court issued notice returnable in four weeks, with the case adjourned for substantive hearing after service of the petition on respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/2842/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP(C) /2842/2026 Shri Sureshwar Poddar challenged the RBI Ombudsman's order (dated 20.02.2026) rejecting his complaint regarding premature closure of his fixed deposit at IndusInd Bank and fraudulent transfer of Rs. 6,50,000. The Gauhati High Court issued notice returnable in four weeks, with the case adjourned for substantive hearing after service of the petition on respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case