Duvvuru Nithya Reddy, vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW — WP/16057/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: APHC010309192026

Filing Number

WP/24790/2026

Filing Date

19-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP/16057/2026

Registration Date

19-Jun-2026

Judge

Harinath.n

Coram

Harinath.n

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MEDICAL ADMISSIONS AND AND OTHER ANCILLARY ISSUES ( 95 )

Judicial Branch

WRIT Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Duvvuru Nithya Reddy,

    Adv. BUGULU SREETEJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH FW

  2. 2.DR. NTR University of Health Sciences,

  3. 3.The Registrar,

  4. 4.The Controller of Examinations,

  5. 5.The Principal,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Harinath.nView PDF

    Summary of WP/16057/2026 Case: Duvvuru Nithya Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Others Decision: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh directed Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences to send the petitioner's Ophthalmology exam papers to a different set of examiners for re-evaluation and reconsideration of Question No. 18 (Set C) regarding the number of neurosensory retina layers. The petitioner marked answer "9," while the university's key indicated "10." The court ordered completion of this re-evaluation within one week, disposing of the petition without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Admission (Medical And Health)

    Harinath.n

  4. 19-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/16057/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP/16057/2026 Case: Duvvuru Nithya Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh & Others Decision: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh directed Dr. NTR University of Health Sciences to send the petitioner's Ophthalmology exam papers to a different set of examiners for re-evaluation and reconsideration of Question No. 18 (Set C) regarding the number of neurosensory retina layers. The petitioner marked answer "9," while the university's key indicated "10." The court ordered completion of this re-evaluation within one week, disposing of the petition without costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case