SRI GANESH TIMBER DEPOT FURNITURE WORKS vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS — WP/15796/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: APHC010297342026
Filing Number
WP/23832/2026
Filing Date
15-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP/15796/2026
Registration Date
17-Jun-2026
Judge
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
Coram
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
ENDOWMENTS (MISC.MATTERS) ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI GANESH TIMBER DEPOT FURNITURE WORKS
Adv. SURYA TEJA ANUMOLU
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH Advocate - GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS
-
2.The State of Andhra Pradesh,
Adv. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
-
3.The Director General of Stamps and Registration
-
4.The District Collector,
-
5.The Endowments Department,
-
6.The Sub-Registrar,
-
7.M/s Padia Timber Company Private Limited (In Liquidation)
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
19-Jun-2026
Tarlada Rajasekhar RaoView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh partially allowed Sri Ganesh Timber Depot's writ petition (19.06.2026). The petitioner won an e-auction on 07.05.2026 but couldn't complete registration because the property (Sy.No.27, Cheemalapalli) was listed under the Prohibited Property List under Section 22A of the Registration Act. The court directed the Liquidator to extend the payment deadline for sale consideration, suspending the original 60-day payment condition until the petition's final resolution. The Devasthanam was impleaded as a respondent, and counter-affidavits were due within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Admission (Endowments)
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
-
15-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/15796/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Andhra Pradesh partially allowed Sri Ganesh Timber Depot's writ petition (19.06.2026). The petitioner won an e-auction on 07.05.2026 but couldn't complete registration because the property (Sy.No.27, Cheemalapalli) was listed under the Prohibited Property List under Section 22A of the Registration Act. The court directed the Liquidator to extend the payment deadline for sale consideration, suspending the original 60-day payment condition until the petition's final resolution. The Devasthanam was impleaded as a respondent, and counter-affidavits were due within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts