Gorlagutta Ramachandrudu, vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, — WP/15374/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS on 11th June 2026.
CNR: APHC010291482026
Filing Number
WP/23268/2026
Filing Date
11-06-2026
Registration No
WP/15374/2026
Registration Date
11-06-2026
Judge
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Coram
SUBBA REDDY SATTI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP ( 28 )
Sub-Category
PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVP., (MISC.MATTERS) ( 35 )
Judicial Branch
WRIT Section
Decision Date
11th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF NO COSTS
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Gorlagutta Ramachandrudu,
Adv. VARUN BYREDDY
Mekala Manohar,
Respondent(s)
The State of Andhra Pradesh,
The State of Andhra Pradesh,
Adv. GP FOR REVENUE
The District Collector,
The Tahsildhar,
The Grama Panchayat,
Hearing History
Judge: SUBBA REDDY SATTI
ADMISSION (PANCHAYAT RAJ)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | ADMISSION (PANCHAYAT RAJ) |
Orders
Case Summary: WP 15374/2026 The Andhra Pradesh High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the Gram Panchayat's attempt to interfere with petitioners' possession of house plots purchased via registered sale deeds in February 2024. The court directed petitioners to submit explanations and documents within seven days responding to panchayat notices dated 06.06.2026 regarding road and drainage construction, and mandated the Panchayat Development Officer consider the response per due procedure with hearing opportunity, while prohibiting coercive action pending compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP 15374/2026 The Andhra Pradesh High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the Gram Panchayat's attempt to interfere with petitioners' possession of house plots purchased via registered sale deeds in February 2024. The court directed petitioners to submit explanations and documents within seven days responding to panchayat notices dated 06.06.2026 regarding road and drainage construction, and mandated the Panchayat Development Officer consider the response per due procedure with hearing opportunity, while prohibiting coercive action pending compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts